How the transfer of properties worked in the Seidling's favor

This is how Bernie Seidling would transfer vendors interest on their land contracts and hide where to send payments to. This is our land record, only one of many, many ways they were deceiving. History of land in Forest Township Tax IDs 014-1020-10 & 014-1020-20 Bernard Seidling

1. 4-14-1989 /Doc. No. 446893 Rueben Gluege Quit Claim Deed to David and Linda Ziemer (1/2 interest)
2. 9-13-1993 /Doc. No. 505358 Rueben Gluege Quit Claim Deed to David and Linda Ziemer (all rights)
3. 11-13-1998 /Doc. No. 591573 the Ziemers Warranty Deed to Four Star Properties (this is a Seidling alias)
4. 11-01-2002 /Doc. No. 696709 Four Star Properties Warranty Deed to Oakridge Family Ltd. Partnership (this partnership is a Seidling alias)
5. 4-04-2003 /Doc. No. 716038 Oakridge Family Ltd. Partnership Warranty Deed back to Four Star Properties, Inc.
6. 7-02-2003 /Doc. No. 728467 Four Star Properties, Inc. Warranty Deed to ZW Enterprises (this is also a Seidling alias)
7. 9-12-2003 /Doc. No. 739879 CSM prepared for Four Star Properties by surveyor Jim Weber
8. 10-15-2003 /Doc. No. 743758 ZW Enterprises Warranty Deed back to Four Star Properties, Inc. (here it shows as a Trust, assets in a Trust are protected.)
9. 4-29-2004 /Doc. No. 761025 Affidavit of Identity document showing Bernie as president of Four Star Properties, Inc.

Then our 5 acres before it became Forest Estates:

1. 5-09-2006 /Doc. No. 824863 Four Star Properties, Inc. files Quiet Title Action on our easement lot # 014-1020-20-300
2. 9-13-2006 /Doc. No. 833371 Four Star Properties, Inc. Our land contract was recorded
3. 9-15-2006 /Doc. No. 834588 Four Star Properties, Inc. Assign. Vendors Interest to Rayon Land Trust (the Seidling's d.b.a.)

Notice all the dates also. At this time we did not receive notification of this document being filed, the change of Vendors Interest to Rayon Land Trust. They (the seidlings) would create a different d.b.a. with a different mailing address, conveniently not send notification to the land contract holder which in turn then the holder would not send a payment to the correct "new" p.o. address, then bernie would be able to "claim" that the holder did not send him proper payment when due and foreclose on said property and be able to not only to foreclose on the remainder due but also sue the land contract holder for the amount that the owner already paid bernie on the land contract.